Inclusive Teaching. The literature is clear: creating classroom spaces, virtual or in-person, where students feel like they belong is an important step to ensuring students are retained and progress to graduation. Amy Pate , Associate Director for Faculty Support within SOLS, and I ran a session recently, co-hosted by the RISE Center for Research in Inclusive STEM Education , that focused on the frameworks that educators use to evaluate whether a given course or curriculum is designed to create such inclusive spaces. The recording of that session can be found here . The session was well attended and interactive, but perhaps you were not able to attend or you are only now hearing about this topic. Below are the highlights of the ideas presented and the questions we grappled with. We need to start with some definitions Inclusive Pedagogy: A student-centered approach to teaching where instructors create an inviting and engaging learning environment for ALL students with diverse background

The opportunity to attend a university online is an attractive option for many students because of the flexibility in scheduling, the lack of commuting, and the ability to work from wherever. This is a particularly enticing option for individuals working full-time in any capacity such as a 9-5 office job or for taking care of children or other family members. So, as universities begin to develop more of these programs, these online programs open access to college degrees for a larger slice of society. However, who is enrolling in these programs, and are there grade differences for different groups of students in online courses? We know that, on average, students from backgrounds that are historically underrepresented in STEM tend to do worse in the classroom compared to their overrepresented counterparts. This group broadly includes BLNP (Black, Latinx, Native American, and Pacific Islander) people, women, people of lower socioeconomic status, and first-generation to college students.

The Black Lives Matter movement and protests in Summer 2020 after the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and Tony McDade, have prompted many educators and researchers to reflect upon racism in the spaces we occupy. As copies of “How to be an anti-racist” by Ibram X. Kendi flew off the shelves in bookstores, we at the Research for Inclusive STEM Education (RISE) center found ourselves wondering what an anti-racist biology curriculum might look like and what steps we could take to re-imagine the curriculum. In response, we organized a workshop in Fall 2020 where graduate students, instructors, faculty, instructional developers, and other staff members came together to begin to address this question. Here, we share some of the ideas that emerged from those discussions in the hopes that we can continue the dialogue on these critical issues. What are some ways in which racism exists in biology curricula and classrooms? In order to dismantle racism in institutional str

Picture in your mind the best teacher you ever had. Remember what they sounded like, how they decorated the classroom, or how they started a lesson? Think about your experience in this complex learning scape and how it shaped your learning at that time and beyond. Why is this teacher, this memory, so profound? Thinking back on school experiences you may remember certain individuals, may they be teachers, tutors, or other role models, that positively shaped your early education experiences. Whether it was through creative lesson plans, active learning assignments, or flipped classrooms, these educators often leave their mark on a student as mentors that bridged gaps in student learning. When we think of mentorship, it often connotes images of an experienced individual paired with a novice to train them in some specialized skill set: student and professor, trainee and advisor, Jedi and Padawan, and more. In higher education (both undergraduate and graduate school) experience and training

People of color are underrepresented in many STEM fields, and this underrepresentation is especially prevalent for Black individuals in evolutionary biology. Although there are many potential reasons why, a new study focuses on a factor that is often missing from these discussions: religious beliefs. It has been well established that Black individuals are more likely to be Christian compared to white individuals. Previous studies have also reported that Black individuals are less likely to accept evolution. However, no prior study has explored the relationships between race/ethnicity, religious beliefs, and evolution acceptance. Because there is often a perceived conflict between Christianity and evolution, a recent study set out to examine if there may be a connection between people of color’s religious affiliation and their acceptance of evolution. People of color are more religious and less accepting of evolution Collecting data from almost 10,000 students in 77 undergraduate biolo

How do you know if your assessments are inclusive? How can you reconsider your assessments to make them more inclusive? Last week, we learned from K. Supriya, Ph.D. , Postdoctoral Researcher in the ASU School of Life Sciences , on ways we can assess our assessments for inclusiveness.  During the webinar we discussed the purpose of assessments in class, examined the various assessment practices we have experienced as students or teachers in various STEM courses with a critical lens, and then came up with an assessment plan for a course we will/might teach in the future.  Watch the discussion here . Purpose of Assessment Let's consider the differences between assessment and evaluation. The purpose of assessment is to increase quality, as seen in formative quizzes, building upon each other. The purpose of evaluation is to judge quality, which is seen more as summative or at the end of the unit or course.  Define Inclusive Assessment Two definitions that Dr. K. Supriya shared, which he

It might seem like a no-brainer , but creating inclusive courses requires putting in the time to examine the way we write and speak. After all, we don’t all have the same culturally influenced lexicon . This week the Teaching Innovation Center’s instructional designers Sarah Prosory and Lenora Ott , discussed ways our written and spoken language can be clarified to create a better course experience for learners.  Universal Design for Learning The presentation explored the Universal Design for Learning Principle 2: Language and Symbols, Checkpoint 1: Clarify Vocabulary and Symbols. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Guidelines are based upon scientific exploration of how humans learn and take into consideration burgeoning research from the fields of education, psychology, and neuroscience. The final goal of UDL is “to change the design of the environment rather than to change the learner”. The guidelines set forth by UDL help instructors create learning environments that accommodat

It is well established that retaining PEERs in science is integral to addressing socioeconomic inequalities in the United States, ensuring that we include the best and brightest minds in the workforce, and minimizing the influence of bias in scientific research (Intemann, 2009). The term PEERs stands for “people excluded because of their ethnicity or race” and in the U.S. includes people who identify as Black or African American, Latinx or Hispanic, and people indigenous to the spaces comprising the United States and its territories (Asai, 2020). There are many efforts that we can make at the undergraduate level to positively influence PEER retention in science, including creating more inclusive undergraduate research experiences. In this post, we present four recommendations to help mentors create more inclusive research experiences for PEERs. We have developed these recommendations based on three studies that we have conducted, which identified negative aspects of undergraduate res